Golf Channel trio takes USGA to task for U.S. Open course setup: 'Sadly, we took a step back'

124 views 0 replies
Reply to Topic
venynx2

Age: 2023
Total Posts: 0
Points: 10

Location:
,
When you’re looking for unfettered analysis of a controversy, in this case the setup of Shinnecock Hills for the third round of the U.S. Open
on Saturday, best to look elsewhere than the rights holder, Fox Sports,
and its long-term contract to air USGA events.To get more golf news, you can visit shine news official website.

Not that Fox did not cover its bases on reporting the controversies, but
unfettered should send you to Golf Channel’s "Live From the U.S. Open."
Its formidable trio of Brandel Chamblee, Frank Nobilo and David Duval
did not disappoint, by declining, predictably, to temper their opinions.
Where to even start?

We’ll start with Nobilo’s summation: “I know a razor edge is a very, very fine line. We’ve got to broaden that
line. It’s not like what happened back in 2004 [the last Open held at
Shinnecock], but it’s eerily close. This week we took a step forward
coming back to Shinnecock, but today, sadly, we took a step back.”
Chamblee, true to form, began with statistics, noting that the first five groups’
average score was 73.2 and the last five was 76.7. He acknowledged the
added pressure of those in contention, but countered with the fact that
their form had been substantially superior over the first 36 holes.
We should not be talking about the condition of the golf course, the setup
of the golf course,” he said. “What we should be talking about is who
played the best today, why they played the best, and not because their
tee time gave them some significant advantage over people playing late.

“If indeed they got the first round right given the harsh conditions and
indeed the second round was without controversy, the USGA is now one for
three. That may get you in the Hall of Fame in baseball, but it is far
below of what is acceptable when you’re setting up a golf course.

“Look at the controversy at Chambers Bay [U.S. Open site in 2015] and again
here. That’s two out of the last three U.S. Open that have called into
question their integrity. It doesn’t happen at any other major
championship. But it consistently happens here. Why? Because the
agronomy today, the success that they’ve had is inconsistent with the
architecture of the past. They can simply get greens too fast for the
way they were designed.

“I was at a course superintendent meeting about four, five six years ago, and they were talking about how bad the
Stimpmeter has been for the game of golf. Almost universally the course
superintendents agreed. They thought there was far too much pressure to
keep the greens at a level that was inconsistent with the great designs
that were a hundred-some odd years ago. What happened?
Two-thousand-four, 14 years ago, they promised us it wouldn’t have
happened again. Well, it happened again. Promises, they didn’t hold
water.”
Duval’s point was that USGA officials were comfortable with how the course was set up for the morning groups. “But you know it’s
going to change, you know it’s going to speed up,” he said. “So if you
like it then, doesn’t that mean you’re probably not going to like it in
the afternoon if it’s set the way you want it at nine or 10 in the
morning? That’s a question I have a little bit of a problem with.

“I believe that you’ve got to have a little bit of leeway, a little bit of
cushion, in how you set them up in case things like this happen today.”

Nobilo had the last word. “Just to put a bow on it,” he said, “the world
number one, Dustin Johnson, come off an unbelievable run of form lately,
he was honest to a fault. He said, ‘I played pretty good.’ Best player
in the world. Didn’t blow that out. He shot 77. Is that how we want
golf?

Posted 19 Jun 2018

Reply to Topic