Verdict in Jackson Trial

4521 views 271 replies
Reply to Topic
2HOT4U

Age: 124
Total Posts: 4298
Points: 0

Location:
USA, USA
Jurors acquited him of ALL molestation charges
whatt??
i can't believe it.
Posted 14 Jun 2005

guest. says
whttttttttttttttttttttttttttt

i dnt belve thssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Posted 14 Jun 2005

guest. says
man..i need to go n chk geo news

Posted 14 Jun 2005

2HOT4U says
ME EITHERRRRRRRRRRRR

i'm trying to call everyone and their phones are all busy
... :S
Posted 14 Jun 2005

2HOT4U says
alright must get back to 'work'
Posted 14 Jun 2005

SohniKuddi says
LOCK UP ALL THE KIDZ

PATHETIC....ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC
Posted 14 Jun 2005

LiL_DollY says
yeah
I just posted similar topic in foreignwood
I was shocked too they found him not guilty
Posted 14 Jun 2005

guest. says
yes!!its true

he got away wid it


bt mayb..he wasnt guilty
Posted 14 Jun 2005

LiL_DollY says
God Knows
Posted 14 Jun 2005

Posted 14 Jun 2005

SohniKuddi says
YEAH...IT;S STRANGE HOW HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY ON ALL ACCOUNTS
Posted 14 Jun 2005

but shukar talain unhon nay yah nahin taha tay
Al-Qaeda ti sazish thi yah bi

lolzzz

Posted 14 Jun 2005

guest. says
thts coz he was innocent
not enuf evidence


so sweet sohni
Posted 14 Jun 2005

oopch
Posted 14 Jun 2005

guest. says
~ ßã£îçh ~ said:

but shukar talain unhon nay yah nahin taha tay
Al-Qaeda ti sazish thi yah bi

lolzzz



yeh bhi hai

Posted 14 Jun 2005

SohniKuddi says
~ ßã£îçh ~ said:

but shukar talain unhon nay yah nahin taha tay
Al-Qaeda ti sazish thi yah bi

lolzzz



LOLZ TEEK KAHA....BUT MAYBE WE SPOKE 2 SOOOON ABHI WAQT HE YEH KEHNE KO


KASHHH
Posted 14 Jun 2005

Awaaara says
he was innocent
Posted 14 Jun 2005

SohniKuddi says
THEY WERE BRIBED
Posted 14 Jun 2005

Asian says
the prosecutions evidance was circumstans. the main witness was not consistant.

they used a Jury trial as "to show that the common lay man has the Law as his own".

Ask your self one Question. as Females if your child (Allah forbid) was assualted in such a way? then would you press for liabel and slander? e.g. Money as Gavin's mother was after


or for a Criminal conviction?

in this respect i would say that the MJ trial is exceptable and perfectly good Law. snedons defece was Puthetic even for a civil advocate (got to be said)

but i agree with the verdict because reguadless of how strange he is, he is NOT a child molesterer. i think it was people using him for money pure and simple
Posted 14 Jun 2005

mallak!! says
publicity stunt....never thot for a minute he was guilty....people need micheal jacksons to keep themselves bus ynow the magic oreality tv iswearing off..simple..fair decision...they shud do da gavin guy over
Posted 14 Jun 2005

Blue Oasis says
kash_beauty said:

yes!!its true

he got away wid it


bt mayb..he wasnt guilty



that's the responce some people are giving "he got away with it..."

I've always believed he was innocent
Posted 14 Jun 2005

Blue Oasis says
Asian said:

the prosecutions evidance was circumstans. the main witness was not consistant.

they used a Jury trial as "to show that the common lay man has the Law as his own".

Ask your self one Question. as Females if your child (Allah forbid) was assualted in such a way? then would you press for liabel and slander? e.g. Money as Gavin's mother was after


or for a Criminal conviction?

in this respect i would say that the MJ trial is exceptable and perfectly good Law. snedons defece was Puthetic even for a civil advocate (got to be said)

but i agree with the verdict because reguadless of how strange he is, he is NOT a child molesterer. i think it was people using him for money pure and simple



Very Very Very well said Asian. I have exactly the same standpoints.

He owns the Beatles Album, each time anyone uses their music he gets paid for it, people were saying on MJ's website that Sony might have a conspiracy to make him sell it - I don't know about that one though.

But yeah in short - he is more innocent than guilty and I can't wait for him to make a grand comeback - and write a book about this whole event - which I would def buy!
Posted 14 Jun 2005

guest. says
chand!

tht time i was shocked!
so i typed whteva came in my mind

i agree wid mani!..its a publicity stunt for the boyz family n MJ as well
Posted 15 Jun 2005

Asian says
Jia_ka_chand said:

Asian said:

the prosecutions evidance was circumstans. the main witness was not consistant.

they used a Jury trial as "to show that the common lay man has the Law as his own".

Ask your self one Question. as Females if your child (Allah forbid) was assualted in such a way? then would you press for liabel and slander? e.g. Money as Gavin's mother was after



see being a Law student works

but i think yes it was simply a money grabbing scandle just like Jordan chandller, another Golddigger

and besides i like his songs
or for a Criminal conviction?

in this respect i would say that the MJ trial is exceptable and perfectly good Law. snedons defece was Puthetic even for a civil advocate (got to be said)

but i agree with the verdict because reguadless of how strange he is, he is NOT a child molesterer. i think it was people using him for money pure and simple



Very Very Very well said Asian. I have exactly the same standpoints.

He owns the Beatles Album, each time anyone uses their music he gets paid for it, people were saying on MJ's website that Sony might have a conspiracy to make him sell it - I don't know about that one though.

But yeah in short - he is more innocent than guilty and I can't wait for him to make a grand comeback - and write a book about this whole event - which I would def buy!
Posted 15 Jun 2005

Blue Oasis says
kash_beauty said:

chand!

tht time i was shocked!
so i typed whteva came in my mind

i agree wid mani!..its a publicity stunt for the boyz family n MJ as well



You're a smart girl Kash and you gave a smart reaction! Those boys and Janet Arvezo are going to face a lot of disgrace!
Posted 16 Jun 2005

mallak!! says
they boy is 15....if mj aws accused..that meant he was abused....and now that mj is not guilty....boy gets no dosh but hes told the world he aws assaulted....his life is over...how cna a mother do this to her kid..how?

andddddddd yes i do think as well it was all done to get mj to seel his back catalogue which he was about to actually..or so i read...he might evcen do that now cuz o his humongous debts
Posted 16 Jun 2005

Asian says
mallak!! said:

they boy is 15....if mj aws accused..that meant he was abused....and now that mj is not guilty....boy gets no dosh but hes told the world he aws assaulted....his life is over...how cna a mother do this to her kid..how?

andddddddd yes i do think as well it was all done to get mj to seel his back catalogue which he was about to actually..or so i read...he might evcen do that now cuz o his humongous debts





well 12 Lay members of the Public find him NOT GULITY in a court of Law, i would rarther respect 12 Lay memebrs being convinced by a Defence then one Judge. Gavin's family background spoke for its self.


like it or lump it we live in a Democracy
Posted 16 Jun 2005

mallak!! says
question is....wud u be saying the same like two weeeks ago wen ppl awnted to rip mj's throat out?

its all media manipulation....and people did get manipulated....smart pr and all.....who wudnt buy da new mj album now?


btw i alawys blv'd him to be innocent....even if he was convicted...the guy is twisted.......anyone wid so much dosh at such yung age wud be...hence he is a victim of the society...
Posted 18 Jun 2005

Asian says
yes i would and I DID,


yes the Media can manipulate people thats why the Juriors were Carefully selected. NEVER before has Jury members actually been means tested, so in a way your remark is insulting their intelegance. they were given the so called proof. and the relevent Statute (Act of congress or the whatever the Amercian people have)


ok let me put it this way. Would you rarther be tryed by a high court judge who day in and day out has heard the same defence over and over again then to assume that they have fixed prejudices. OR


would you be tryed infront of Lay Members of the public, 12 people are harder to convince then one......
Posted 20 Jun 2005

valandrian says
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647bd48647
bd48647
Posted 26 May 2018

Posted 18 Sep 2018

Reply to Topic