2003 worst year ever 4 lolly

1380 views 21 replies

naheem

Age: 124
Total Posts: 112
Points: 0

Location:
United Kingdom, United Kingdom

I think 2003 was the worst ever year in the history of Lollywood. During the year 17 Urdu films, 16 Punjabi films and 15 Pushto films were released and no movie was declared a hit.
*(source)Rashid Khawaja

Posted 19 Jan 2004

STANDARD says

STANDARD

Age: 124
7628 days old here
Total Posts: 2890
Points: 0

Location:
Pakistan, Pakistan

but 'Commando' is still running...so 'Commando' is a hit movie....

reason is that I think nowadays viewers r so mature than previous,viwers r watching nabor country movie and our directors r new..so their direction is weak..new actor,actress performances is not like film..

Posted 19 Jan 2004

shaby says

shaby

Age: 124
7487 days old here
Total Posts: 1287
Points: 0

Location:
United Kingdom, United Kingdom

comando and laaj were hit

Posted 19 Jan 2004

MR PERFECT says

MR PERFECT

Age: 124
7671 days old here
Total Posts: 3942
Points: 0

Location:
Canada, Canada

lol. from what i hear laaj was as bad, if not worse than larki punjaban.

Posted 19 Jan 2004

charizmatic says

charizmatic

Age: 124
7543 days old here
Total Posts: 5317
Points: 0

Location:
Pakistan, Pakistan

well laaaj was far far more better than larki punjaban both technically and script wise and business wise as well for u kind information laaj was super hit in NWFP circuit.

Posted 19 Jan 2004

MR PERFECT says

MR PERFECT

Age: 124
7671 days old here
Total Posts: 3942
Points: 0

Location:
Canada, Canada

charizmatic said:
well laaaj was far far more better than larki punjaban...business wise...

not what i heard/read.

here's just one article i read:

'...all these themes are strong enough to evoke passion and consequently appeal for the movie. Sadly for Laaj's writer-director Rauf Khalid this hasn't happened. Even a casual viewing of the film shows that he has only himself to blame for the failure. First, he has tried to do too much. In a short span of three hours, he has attempted, unsuccessfully though, to prove or disprove too many theories - that Muslims are forgiving and considerate, that the British exploited Hindu-Muslim divide to strengthen their rule in India, that goras succeeded because of fifth columnists among us, that Pashtuns fiercely guarded their independence against the colonial invaders, that love knows no differences --the list can go on forever like this.'

the article can be read in full @:
http://pakistani_films.tripod.com/laaj.htm

and peeps....most of u know, i'm a HUGE lolly fan. i wanted laaj AND lp AND every other movie 2 do good. unfortunately tho, with the exception of commando, NONE could be labelled as hits, so far. but since some think laaj was better in comparison 2 LP, i thought i'd bring u back down 2 earth!!

Posted 19 Jan 2004

STANDARD says

STANDARD

Age: 124
7628 days old here
Total Posts: 2890
Points: 0

Location:
Pakistan, Pakistan

this article is bogus....mojority of serious people r so impressed this movie...but due to some mistake..this movie couldn't hit..
I agree Laaj is better than lp.

Posted 19 Jan 2004

MR PERFECT says

MR PERFECT

Age: 124
7671 days old here
Total Posts: 3942
Points: 0

Location:
Canada, Canada

ydakh said:
this article is bogus....mojority of serious people r so impressed this movie...but due to some mistake..this movie couldn't hit..
I agree Laaj is better than lp.

better than LP, but a flop nonetheless!!

and ydakh, i'm not disputing your view, but i could say the same abt LP. according to MANY people (on the site of the film) they were very impressed by this movie (in the UK).

NFAKFan38005.9952199074

Posted 19 Jan 2004

STANDARD says

STANDARD

Age: 124
7628 days old here
Total Posts: 2890
Points: 0

Location:
Pakistan, Pakistan

hahahah...

..I knew u will angry...but my view on facts basis not emotional basis..me totally neutral..nishta favor kisi key...

lp liked people only post on lp site...but who didn't like those who didn't post in lp site..that clear.....

Posted 20 Jan 2004

MR PERFECT says

MR PERFECT

Age: 124
7671 days old here
Total Posts: 3942
Points: 0

Location:
Canada, Canada

ydakh said:
hahahah... ..I knew u will angry...but my view on facts basis not emotional basis..me totally neutral..nishta favor kisi key...

lp liked people only post on lp site...but who didn't like those who didn't post in lp site..that clear.....

angry?! nai jee! and i'm not emotional either. lol

the bottom line is, laaj and larki punjaban both had potential and both were appreciated by most who watched them. but regardless, they flopped. the end result: this ain't good 4 the industry, cause BOTH were touted to break records and BOTH failed to do so, hence 2003 being the worst year ever 4 lolly, as u said!! so why single out lp, like many, including yourself seem 2 be doing??!!NFAKFan38006.2230208333

Posted 20 Jan 2004

umair16 says

umair16

Age: 79
7579 days old here
Total Posts: 795
Points: 0

Location:
london, United Kingdom

2003 was not a bad year for lollywood . . come on people . .i understand their was no super super hit but atleast the tenology has omproved and location and now directors are trying to make good movies

I dont think this was a bad year for lollywood its just the starting of a better lollywood it takes time . .

Posted 20 Jan 2004

STANDARD says

STANDARD

Age: 124
7628 days old here
Total Posts: 2890
Points: 0

Location:
Pakistan, Pakistan

umair16 said:
2003 was not a bad year for lollywood . . come on people . .i understand their was no super super hit but atleast the tenology has omproved and location and now directors are trying to make good movies

I dont think this was a bad year for lollywood its just the starting of a better lollywood it takes time . .

well said umair16,u is so true..me also not belive in hit,flop..4 quality movie has released in 2003..2002 is only 1..so it's improvement..hit or flop is just luck.

Posted 20 Jan 2004

MR PERFECT says

MR PERFECT

Age: 124
7671 days old here
Total Posts: 3942
Points: 0

Location:
Canada, Canada

agreed! good point umair16!

Posted 20 Jan 2004

umair16 says

umair16

Age: 79
7579 days old here
Total Posts: 795
Points: 0

Location:
london, United Kingdom

Thank you .

Posted 20 Jan 2004

valandrian says

valandrian

Age: 2023
2218 days old here
Total Posts: 232
Points: 10

Location:
,

Posted 03 Jun 2018

valandrian says

valandrian

Age: 2023
2218 days old here
Total Posts: 232
Points: 10

Location:
,

Posted 03 Oct 2018

vraiel says

vraiel