The fans are obviously in favor of the three and the league approves
anything that gets eyeballs. The 3-pointer has generated excitement and
allows teams Orlando Calixte Youth Jersey to rally from big deficits, which is fine. But why has the NBA
abandoned the mid-range, and is that really good for the game when
everyone plays the same way -- take shots from deep or at the rim but
nothing in between?
“You’ve got to go to bat with your strengths,” said DeRozan. “I grew up
watching old school basketball and I came into the league like that. A
lot of these young guys are watching the league in a whole different
dynamic than what we had. It just come with the times.”
It’s rather Orlando Cepeda Youth Jersey silly when you consider it, because part of the problem is too many
wanna-be’s who are hitting 32 percent from deep are trying to match
Stephen Curry’s brilliance, when it’s probably easier, and nearly as
lucrative, to follow the DeRozan blueprint. The game could use more
offensive balance, players who can back their man down, sink the
baseline 18-footer and most important, draw contact and get to the free
throw line.But coaches and general managers, drunk on analytics, are
either too afraid to break from the trend or not creative enough to
design an offense that showcases both the long-distance shooter and the
mid-range specialist. The league is on pace this season to attempt the
fewest number of shots defined as “mid-range” since those stats were
first kept in 1996-97. It’s now at 19 percent, which would drop under
the previous single-season low of 22 percent last season, Reyes Moronta Youth Jersey and far below 38 percent in 1999-2000.
Because of that, it’s a good bet that waves of teenagers with pro
aspirations and potential are junking the mid-range game altogether for
3-point shooting, since that’s the message being sent by the NBA. When
the ball finds them 18 feet from the basket, some are uncomfortable and
rattled.
