Logo

Islam and Science



The Authenticity of the Qur'an

Dr. Maurice Bucaille:

Maurice Bucaille (Professor of Surgery, France) in his book, The Bible, the Qur'an and Science mentions the following (quoting page 120):

"What initially strikes the reader confronted for the first time with a text (The Qur'an) of this kind is the sheer abundance of subjects discussed; The Creation, Astronomy, the Explanation of Certain Matters concerning the Earth, the Animal and Vegetable Kingdoms and Human Reproduction.

Whereas monumental errors are to be found in the Bible, I could not find a single error in the Qur'an. I had to stop and ask myself; if a man was the author of the Qur'an, how could he have written facts in the seventh century AD, that today are shown to be in keeping with modern scientific knowledge?

There was absolutely no doubt about it, the text of the Qur'an we have today is most definitely a text of the period, if I may be allowed to put it in these terms. What human explanation can there be for this observation? In my opinion there is no explanation; there is no special reason why an inhabitant of the Arabian Peninsula should, at a time when King Dagobert was reigning in France (629-639 AD) have had scientific knowledge on certain subjects that was ten centuries ahead of our own."

Dr. Jacques Cousteau:

Captain Jacques Cousteau, an eminent French Research Professor embraces Islam as a result of reading in the Qur'an verses which 1400 years ago were related to the result of his recent research work. That is, there are phenomenal barriers at connections of certain oceans, and that the waters of one sea do not mix with that of the other.

The Qur'an clearly states the above fact:

"He has let free the two bodies of flowing water, meeting together:

Between them is a barrier which they do not transgress."

(Qur'an, Ar-Rahman 55:19-20)




Posted on 12/26/2005 4:24:56 PM




Scientific Discoveries Conform with Qur'anic Verses

Dr Keith Moore:

Professor Keith Moore (Anatomy, University of Toronto, Canada) describes the stages of human development, in his book The Developing Human, clinically Oriented Embryology:

"Growth of science was slow during the medieval period and a few high points of embryological investigation undertaken during this age are known to us. It is cited in the Qur'an, the Holy Book of the Muslims, that human beings are produced from a mixture of secretions from the male and the female.

Several references are made to the creation of a human being from a sperm drop, and it is also suggested that the resulting organism settles in the womb like a seed, six days after its beginning. The human blastocyst begins to implant about six days after fertilisation.

The Qur'an also states that the sperm drop develops "into a congealed clot of blood". An implanted blastocyst or a spontaneously aborted conceptus would resemble a blood clot. Reference is also made to the leech-like appearance of the embryo. The embryo is not unlike a leech, or a bloodsucker, in appearance."

"The embryo is also said to resemble 'a chewed piece of substance' like gum or wood. The somites do in fact resemble the teethmarks in a chewed substance."

"The developing embryo was considered to become human at 40-42 days and to no longer resemble an animal embryo at this stage. The human embryo begins to acquire human characteristics at this stage.

"The Qur'an also states that the embryo develops between 'three veils of darkness'. This probably refers to:

the maternal anterior abdominal wall,
the uterine wall, and
the aminiochorionic membrane.

Space does not permit discussion of several other interesting references to human prenatal development which appear in the Qur'an."
(The Developing Human, Dr KL Moore, M.Sc, Ph.D, FIAC, FRSM)






Posted on 12/26/2005 4:27:30 PM

great.but science and religion r two different things.

Posted on 12/26/2005 6:52:30 PM

i dont think so Nikammay bhai...

watever i read and study about nature, it makes me belief Stronger,...

SUBHAAN-ALLAH..


Posted on 12/27/2005 12:26:57 PM

well science is in quran not the other wau around

Posted on 12/28/2005 7:13:21 PM

ager aisa hota to jitne bhi nature and science parhte hain sab musalman ho jate

Posted on 12/28/2005 7:14:36 PM

wo musalmaan hon ya na hon, but i m sure they all beleive...
Nikammay bhai agar aap ne Mumtaaz mufti ki talash pardhi hey to aapko andaza ho ga, us kitaab main is hawalay se baat ki gai hey...

personally everytime i read and study my subjects, i feel k mera imaan pehle se zyada mazboot hota hey...


Posted on 12/28/2005 9:01:44 PM

already read these articles

i dont think if science and religion are different things
sirf point of view different hai,, dono nature ko analyse karte hein,, science HERAN hone liye aur religion Allah ki AZMAT bayan karne liye

hmmm but i beleive k bohottt si cheezein aisi hein jinn ka answer insan k paas na hai aur shayad na hoga

Posted on 12/30/2005 3:53:19 PM

Insaan wo e janta hey Jitna Allah Ta'ala usay batana chahta hey. Insaan ka ilm mehdood hey,

baharhaal ye mera zaati khayal hey k Science ki study insaan ko zaroot karni chahiye, imaan mazboot hota hey..


Posted on 12/31/2005 2:41:05 PM