SALL said: well im not hindu and i can only thnx Allah that he made me belong to a muslim family,, so muslim paida hone mei mera koi kamal nahi
now wot i think abt hinduisme,, hmmmm nothing much
im against their cast system even tho we muslims believe and practice it
rahi baat devi/devtaon ki,, i ve nothing to say against it
Molana Asrar once talked abt the logic of prosterning infront of statues,,
according to hindu scholars hindu "dheyan" k liye buut k agay jhukte hein bilkul jaise muslims ka "dheyan" kibla ki taraf hota hai,, hijr e aswad is a stone too
they beleiev in ishwar and we beleive in Allah,, we believe in angels and prophets and they beleive in devi/devta (called bhagwan ka avtar)
woh log paise k liye laxmi devi k agay jhukte hein,,, we do the same but we dont name it a devi,,
aik "jahil" hindu aur muslim mei koi fark nahi hai
han Islam ar hinduism mei bohot fark hai
baat sirf imaan, yakeen aur niyyat ki hai
its said that RAM may b a prophet, same is said abt Buddha, agar uss ko maane waale galt ho gae to unn mei hum mei koi fark nahi coz we ve changed our religion too
i have a translation of Ramayan but never get time to read it
Sall, Sall, Sall...... I completely, totally, and absolutely disagree with your equating Islam with Hinduism or Muslims with Hindus.
Hindu religion is a total opposite of monotheism. A believer believes and bows in front of Allah alone with no need for any interpreter or middle-man. A muslim knows that Allah alone can provide for needs and wants of every creature. There is just no room for another deity. No body bows or prostrate to "Hijr ul Aswad". People kiss it because the prophet of Allah did and was ordered by Allah. Allah ordered none other stones to be kissed, let alone bowing or prostrating to it and asking it to provide anything. Anyone who takes Hijrul Aswad or kabaa itself as divine or being able to provide anything, are no less than mushrik.
Allah says about those beliving in gods of stone and such earthly materialthat those "humans and their stone (gods) will become the fuel of the hell fire.)
In another place, Allah swt draws parables between believers and mushrikeen when he asks, do people who can see and blinds are equal", He asks, "those who can hear and deaf are equal?" He asks, are people of paradise and people of hell fire are the same? Then He says, "people of the pradise are those who have succeeded and placed high".
Ram, Buddha ... whoever they were and whatever was their message then, it contradicts the basic tenets of Islam and the islamic belief system, i.e, unity of God.
Islam has not changed and it still is in its original form, i.e pillars of faith, and articles of belief are intact as they were the first day.
Likewise, teachings of Moses and Jesus were very similar to those of prophet Mohammed, but the change in those religions were fundamental and they lost their basic ingedients. If anything closer to Islam are the people of the book. Hinduism is a total opposite of it. Islam was sent to protect people from hell fire whose fuel would be the people and the stones with which they made their own gods.